Rethinking the process for Strategic Planning
... a post-pandemic approach.
The planning process has changed (for the better) since COVID.
​
The pandemic forced us to work differently.
-
Public health guidelines meant that many of us worked remotely via video-conferencing rather than meeting in person.
-
As strategy and meeting facilitation experts, we witnessed a paradigm shift: executive teams devised plans in a novel way that never would have been considered in the pre-pandemic world.
There are two parts to strategic planning.
Strategic planning – no matter the time horizon (1, 3, or 5 years) – has two parts:
-
The plan document(s)
-
The process of devising the plan: Establishing and/or revising the mission, vision, values, SWOT, goals, objectives, strategies, tactics and implementation
Let’s review the pre- and post-pandemic scenarios: "before" and the "new approach"
​
BEFORE
​
Here is the typical pre-pandemic approach to the strategic planning process:
-
A 3-day off-site meeting with senior executives, held once per year
-
Lots of PowerPoint presentations ("death" by PowerPoint)
-
Sometimes round-table discussions, Q&A: strong personalities might dominate
There are three main pitfalls with this approach: time poverty, pre-work, and post-meeting follow-up.
​
Pitfall #1: Time Poverty
-
Three days can seem like plenty of time to craft a strategic plan.
-
However, once the agenda is circulated, most people do not realize how little time has actually been allocated for truly creative thinking and innovative ideas.
-
Typically, each functional area is given a time slot for a presentation and Q&A. In the end, there may be only 10 to 15 minutes of discussion per topic.
-
These discussions are generally unstructured conversations: "Hey Jill, what do you think?" People’s comments are typically top-of-mind thoughts without a lot of critical thinking, especially if there was no pre-work (see below).
-
This overall approach does not provide the ingredients of a robust strategic plan – one based on insights, and which creates and capitalizes on competitive advantage and realizes cost efficiencies.
-
-
In our experience, the best results come from a collaborative client-plus-consultant approach requiring 150 to 350+ consulting hours, depending on the sector, the complexity of the organization, and the strategic opportunities and challenges being tackled.
​
Pitfall #2: Pre-work … too much or too little
-
This is often a problem of extremes: either voluminous amounts of information which overwhelms participants and thus goes unread, or no pre-session assignment.
-
As a result, participants arrive with their usual points of view and no new perspectives because their thinking has not been challenged.
-
Extroverts may dominate the meeting. Introverts will quietly withdraw.
Pitfall #3: Post-meeting follow-up … usually minimal
-
During the meeting, participants will individually take notes.
-
Some groups designate a scribe to record the main discussion points and decisions.
-
This is fine, but this is not a strategic plan.
-
-
Without synthesis and linkages to the organizations mission and vision, the “plan” becomes a list of tactics, rather than a roadmap based on insights of how the organization will “win”.
SO, WHAT'S THE SOLUTION?
​
The new approach for strategic planning, combines a mix of:
Here are 5 reasons why many organizations are moving to this hybrid model.
​
Reason #1: Incubation time
-
The process starts with a series of virtual meetings. They take place over several weeks; often one meeting per week over 5 to 6 weeks.
-
Pre-work is assigned prior to each meeting to stimulate creative thinking and innovative approaches.
-
The meetings are 2 to 3 hours long, each one on a very focused topic.
-
We frequently use virtual break-out groups and other digital tools.
Reason #2: Broad participation
-
Virtual meetings allow team members from various locations to participate.
-
No travel is involved (no airfare, hotels, meals...), so there are cost savings.
-
Short meetings are easier to schedule within people's existing agendas.
​
Reason #3: Effective conversations and problem-solving with professional meeting facilitation
-
Effective meeting design ensures all participants can contribute optimally.
-
Engagement tools, both on-line (virtual) and in-person, create dynamic sessions where creativity thrives.
-
Methods such as: Six Thinking Hats, World Café, Open-Space Technology, Business Simulations (group role play), and hundreds more.
-
Guided discussions ensure that all voices are heard.
-
Orthodoxies are challenged (“we’ve always done it that way” … “that’ll never work”)
​
Reason #4: New perspectives and insights are uncovered
-
Strategic consulting expertise injects rigour and best practice strategy models, tools, and approaches.
-
Opportunities and challenges are revisited with a fresh, new view.
-
Linkages between various facets of the plan are revealed.
-
Bold and innovative strategies are proposed.
-
Capacity building: greater critical and strategic thinking.
​
Reason #5: A new focus for the off-site, in-person meeting
Yes … you might still hold that off-site session, but now, with a more focused purpose.
-
Imagine a deeper dive on the innovative ideas that emerged throughout the virtual meetings.
-
Imagine using scenario thinking to visualize potential futures.
-
Imagine business simulations and group-role playing to anticipate the reaction of competitors or stakeholders to your leading-edge strategies.
-
Imagine your team engaged in innovation and creativity games to fine-tune strategic approaches.
-
Imagine team-building exercises that help create and solidify your desired organizational culture.​